CLV Aware Challenger
Experimental strategy family designed to test whether stronger pricing quality and closing-line behavior can improve promotion decisions over time.
Experimental strategy
This strategy family is tracked against the live TipSignal baseline, but it does not power the production picks, analytics, or bankroll pages. Use the lab to compare behavior, not to follow the picks in real betting.
What this challenger is trying to prove
Experimental strategy family designed to test whether stronger pricing quality and closing-line behavior can improve promotion decisions over time.
The key comparison is always this challenger's current live config versus the production baseline's current live config. Candidate promotion happens inside this challenger family only and does not affect the live site automatically. The challenger tabs below still expose legacy SAFE_ODDS and HIGH_ODDS snapshot views for research continuity; they are not the same thing as the newer strategy-engine modes.
Independent artifacts
- Own live config, candidate config, and config history.
- Own legacy SAFE_ODDS and HIGH_ODDS snapshot artifacts for side-by-side research.
- Own simulator artifact with the same VOID, REVIEW, and daily staking logic as production.
- Own optimizer reports and baseline comparison layer for the snapshot-era ranking pipeline.
Current live challenger versus current live production
The cards below are optimizer-report comparisons in ROI points, hit rate, and drawdown. They are not the same thing as simulator bankroll profit, and they still belong to the legacy SAFE_ODDS/HIGH_ODDS ranking world rather than the newer official/hybrid/v2 strategy-mode layer.
Which track makes more bankroll money in the simulator
This comparison uses the simulator artifacts rather than the optimizer report. It is the cleaner view if your main question is simply which track has made more money since the optimizer-era start date.